Home / Services / Synthetic Biology Chassis Development / Bacterial Chassis Engineering / Pseudomonas putida Genome Editing & Metabolic Engineering Solutions / Pseudomonas putida-Based Assay and Modeling Services

Pseudomonas putida-Based Assay and Modeling Services

CD Biosynsis offers advanced Pseudomonas putida-Based Assay and Modeling Services, integrating cutting-edge experimental analysis with powerful computational modeling to facilitate rational strain design and optimization. P. putida is a robust, versatile microbial host known for its high respiratory capacity and tolerance to inhibitory compounds, making it ideal for biomanufacturing and bioremediation. Our services move beyond simple genetic modification by providing a deep, quantitative understanding of the host's behavior. We combine high-precision In Vitro and In Vivo assays (metabolomics, fluxomics, protein activity) with Constraint-Based Modeling (CBM) and Kinetic Modeling to accurately predict metabolic flux, optimize gene expression levels, and pinpoint systemic bottlenecks. This integrated approach minimizes trial-and-error experimentation, ensuring rapid and predictable development of high-performance P. putida strains.

Get a Quote
Service Overview Assay & Modeling Types Integrated Workflow Advantages FAQs

Integrating Data and Prediction for Rational Strain Design

The highly flexible and complex metabolic network of Pseudomonas putida demands sophisticated tools to guide effective metabolic engineering efforts. Our Assay and Modeling platform bridges the gap between genotypic edits and phenotypic outcomes. By experimentally characterizing key cellular metrics (Assays) and using this data to parameterize predictive Models, we can accurately simulate the effects of genetic modifications before they are built in the lab. This capability is central to the Design-Build-Test-Learn (DBTL) cycle [Image of Design-Build-Test-Learn Cycle] , allowing our clients to make informed decisions, prioritize the most effective genetic targets, and drastically reduce the number of iterative experiments required to achieve optimal product yield and purity.

Assay and Computational Modeling Types Offered

Quantitative Experimental Assays Computational Modeling Tools Data Integration & Analysis

Quantitative Experimental Assays (Data Generation)

High-Resolution Measurement of Cellular Metrics

Metabolomics Profiling (Targeted/Untargeted)

Comprehensive GC-MS/LC-MS analysis of intracellular and extracellular metabolites to quantify pathway intermediates and track precursor consumption.

Fluxomics (Isotope Tracing)

Measurement of metabolic fluxes via 13C labeling and mass spectrometry to accurately determine carbon flow through central metabolism and target pathways .

Transcriptomics & Proteomics

Quantification of mRNA (RNA-seq) and protein levels to map gene expression and enzyme concentrations in response to engineering and environmental changes.

Computational Modeling Tools (Prediction & Optimization)

Simulating Strain Behavior for Rational Design

Constraint-Based Modeling (FBA)

Using Flux Balance Analysis (FBA) based on the P. putida genome-scale model to predict maximum theoretical yields, optimize substrate utilization, and propose effective gene knockouts.

Metabolic Control Analysis (MCA)

Identifying the rate-limiting steps (bottlenecks) and determining the sensitivity of metabolic fluxes to changes in enzyme activity or concentration.

Kinetic Modeling

Development of dynamic models to simulate time-dependent changes in cell growth, substrate uptake, and product formation under various fermentation strategies.

Data Integration and Predictive Analysis

Guiding the Design-Build-Test-Learn Cycle

Optimal Target Recommendation

Using model outputs (e.g., FBA predictions and MCA results) to recommend the most impactful genetic targets for knockout, knock-in, or expression tuning.

Predictive Promoter Tuning

Calculating the optimal expression level for each enzyme in a pathway to maximize flux, guiding the selection of promoter strength and RBS optimization (using Base Editing).

Fermentation Condition Simulation

Simulating the strain's performance under different media compositions, oxygen levels (due to P. putida's high respiration), and nutrient feeding strategies to optimize industrial process parameters.

Assay and Modeling Integrated Workflow (DBTL)

We connect high-quality experimental data with predictive simulation to deliver highly efficient strain optimization.

1. Design (Modeling & Prediction)

2. Build (Strain Construction)

3. Test (Assay & Data Generation)

4. Learn (Re-Modeling & Optimization)

Establish a computational model (FBA, Kinetic) based on the target pathway and host.

Simulate effects of potential edits (e.g., knockouts, promoter changes) and predict optimal genetic design.

Generate initial hypothesis and experimental plan.

Execute precision gene editing (CRISPR-Cas9, Base Editing) to construct rationally engineered strains.

Build genetic libraries (e.g., promoter libraries) based on model recommendations.

  • Quantitative Assays: Perform metabolomics, fluxomics, and expression profiling on engineered strains.
  • Phenotype: Measure growth rate, product titer, and robustness under controlled fermentation conditions.
  • QC: Verify genotype and overall strain stability.

Integrate new experimental data to validate and refine the computational model.

Identify prediction errors, extract new design rules, and recommend the next set of rational edits for further improvement.

Deliver the predictive model and data-driven optimization strategy.

Superiority in Pseudomonas putida Assay and Modeling

High-Precision Flux Analysis

Expertise in both experimental 13C-Fluxomics and computational FBA modeling for accurate flux determination and visualization in complex P. putida metabolism.

Data-Driven Rational Design

Computational modeling is performed before and after strain construction to ensure all genetic edits are maximally effective and guided by current data, minimizing trial-and-error.

Host-Specific Model Tuning

Use of the established P. putida KT2440 genome-scale model as a base, customized with multi-omics data specific to the client's engineered or wild-type strain.

Accelerated DBTL Cycle

The synergy between assay (Test) and modeling (Design/Learn) dramatically reduces the number of required R&D iterations, leading to faster strain development.

FAQs About P. putida Assay and Modeling Services

Still have questions?

Contact Us

What is the primary benefit of using FBA for P. putida engineering?

FBA (Flux Balance Analysis) provides a computational prediction of the maximum theoretical yield of a product, allowing engineers to identify the primary limiting factors (e.g., carbon flux bottlenecks) and prioritize gene knockouts for flux redirection before expensive lab work begins.

How do you obtain the data to parameterize your computational models?

Model parameters are derived from high-resolution experimental assays, including metabolite concentrations (Metabolomics), enzyme activity levels (Proteomics), and measured metabolic fluxes (Fluxomics/13C labeling), ensuring high prediction accuracy.

Is your modeling compatible with my specific P. putida strain?

Yes. We use the comprehensive P. putida genome-scale model as a base and then customize it with experimental data unique to your specific engineered or wild-type strain, ensuring the model is highly predictive for your system.

What is the benefit of Kinetic Modeling over FBA?

FBA provides steady-state flux predictions. Kinetic Modeling is more advanced, incorporating time-dependent enzyme kinetics, allowing us to simulate dynamic processes like substrate feeding, induction timing, and lag-phase behavior during industrial fermentation.