Structural Comparison & Docking
Modeling the target enzyme with its native cofactor and the desired non-native cofactor to identify steric and electrostatic clashes/gaps.
Enzyme Cofactor Engineering is a specialized service focused on modifying an enzyme's interaction with its non-protein chemical helper molecule (cofactor), aiming to enhance catalytic efficiency, switch cofactor specificity, or improve cofactor recycling. Many industrially relevant enzymes, such as dehydrogenases and monooxygenases, rely on expensive cofactors like NADH, NADPH, or ATP. By rationally engineering the cofactor binding pocket, we can reduce the reliance on costly cofactors, improve the enzyme's turnover rate, or introduce non-native cofactors to facilitate novel chemical transformations.
CD Biosynsis offers expert CRO services in Cofactor Engineering, combining structural bioinformatics, molecular docking, and targeted mutagenesis. Our platform precisely identifies key residues responsible for cofactor recognition and binding affinity. We specialize in designing mutations to switch cofactor preference (e.g., from NADPH-dependent to the cheaper NADH-dependent), increasing the efficiency of cofactor regeneration systems, and stabilizing the bound cofactor structure. This engineering approach is critical for reducing the operating costs of large-scale biocatalytic processes and expanding the scope of enzymatic reactions in green chemistry.
Get a QuoteWe provide methods to overcome the limitations of expensive cofactors and inefficient cofactor utilization.
Cofactor engineering drives innovation in industrial biocatalysis where cost is a major factor:
Cost-Reduced Bioprocesses
Reducing the industrial cost of synthesis by engineering enzymes to use cheaper or easier-to-regenerate cofactors (e.g., NADH over NADPH).
Metabolic Engineering Optimization
Balancing the flux and redox state within engineered microorganisms by tuning the consumption of cofactors like NAD+/NADH or ATP/ADP.
Expanded Enzyme Scope
Enabling enzymes to utilize non-native cofactors, which may allow for new reaction chemistries or improved tolerance to harsh industrial conditions.
Biosensor Specificity
Engineering detection enzymes to exclusively rely on a specific cofactor, enhancing the orthogonality and reliability of biosensing devices.
Our platform employs rational design to precisely manipulate the cofactor binding environment.
Structural Comparison & Docking
Modeling the target enzyme with its native cofactor and the desired non-native cofactor to identify steric and electrostatic clashes/gaps.
Specificity Residue Targeting
Focusing on conserved residues that specifically interact with the unique chemical moieties (e.g., 2’-phosphate group in NADPH) to mediate the switch.
Charge and Hydrogen Bond Optimization
Designing mutations that introduce or remove charged groups (e.g., Lys/Arg to Asp/Glu) to create favorable electrostatic interactions with the new cofactor.
Combined Active Site & Cofactor Tunneling
Modeling the coupled movement of the cofactor and the substrate to ensure the engineering enhances both binding and the catalytic transfer step.
Kinetic Validation (Km and kcat)
High-resolution kinetic assays to quantify the improvement in Km (affinity) and kcat (turnover) for both the native and the engineered cofactor.
Our Cofactor Engineering process employs a structural and kinetic-driven design cycle:
CD Biosynsis delivers functionally switched enzymes with validated kinetic profiles for industrial use. Every project includes:
Why is switching from NADPH to NADH often desired?
NADH is typically much cheaper than NADPH, and industrial organisms (like E. coli) often have metabolic pathways that naturally favor the regeneration of NADH, making it a more cost-effective choice for large-scale biocatalysis.
Can this service be applied to metal cofactors (e.g., Fe, Zn)?
Yes. For metal cofactors, we focus on engineering the metal-coordinating residues (His, Cys, Asp, Glu) and the secondary shell residues to alter metal affinity, stability, or the reduction potential of the active site.
How accurate is the prediction of the Km change?
Computational tools like MM/GBSA provide accurate *relative* rankings of binding affinity, allowing us to select the best mutants. While absolute Km values are hard to predict, we successfully identify mutations that achieve the desired large change in cofactor preference.
What specific residues are usually targeted for NADPH/NADH switch?
The NADPH cofactor has an extra phosphate group on its adenine ribose. We typically target a charged residue (like Arg) that binds this phosphate in the native enzyme, substituting it with a neutral residue (like Gly or Ser) to reduce repulsion/clash with the non-phosphorylated NADH.
Can you increase the stability of the enzyme-cofactor complex?
Yes. By introducing mutations that form additional stabilizing interactions (e.g., new H-bonds) between the enzyme and the cofactor, we can lower the dissociation constant (Kd), keeping the enzyme active longer under operational conditions.
Do the mutations affect the enzyme's active site function?
We carefully select residues that are remote from the substrate binding pocket but close to the cofactor. However, any structural change can subtly impact the active site, which is why we measure kcat/Km for both the substrate and the new cofactor.